8 Comments

Loved reading this piece, Harry. Especially your breakdown of those early computer games, which mesmerised this child no less than it did yours.

Expand full comment
author

Thanks Matt - yes fond memories

Expand full comment

Very interesting and informative, Harry, especially as I knew nothing about computers games or their history ! Also enjoyed reading about the differences between Banksy and Invader. I’m actually feeling much more ‘up to date’ now !

Expand full comment
author

Thanks Maureen

Expand full comment

Ahhhh - I've seen these and have never known what they were! Thank you Harry, this was fascinating.

Expand full comment
author

Thanks Jodi

Expand full comment
18 hrs ago·edited 18 hrs agoLiked by Harry Watson

It raises the question of whether art is for the public or for only the wealthy. The artists themselves have often been clear in that they prefer a wide audience for their works. Museums say it is for the public, although they often charge an entry for us to look at the artistic impressions. Private collectors keep what they buy private, locked away. I think Bansky and Invader want to make art less elitist and more accessible.

Expand full comment
author

Indeed Perry. In the case of the Baltic Gallery, the funding to establish it came from public funds and it runs as a charity relying on a combination of donations, sponsorship etc but all exhibitions are free to enter. They see themselves as a community organisation making art available to all who enter their doors.

Expand full comment